you don’t say
Monday, July 18, 2005
Mississippi Sun Herald: Advisers want Bush to consider conservative men for court.
Duuuuh. I hope those advisers are being paid ridiculous sums of money.
The lede is telling:
Although some Supreme Court analysts think that President Bush will turn to a woman or minority to replace Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the White House also is weighing a different kind of history-making pick: nominating a strong conservative who would change the direction and future of the court.
I love that the choice is either a “strong conservative” or a minority or woman.
So minorities and women can’t be “strong conservatives” …
No, I’m telling you: They can’t.
Conservatives contend that if Bush nominates a justice like O’Connor, he will have forfeited his opportunity to change the court.
My brain hurts.
But it does get better. See, you thought I was making fun of the reporter and the copy editor who wrote the headline, but the “former administration officials” are the ones telling the story:
Make the more controversial, conservative nominee first, and then turn to a woman or minority when Rehnquist steps down, the former officials have advised.
Now that’s some good, old-fashioned advising. You know? It all makes more sense if you translate it into Korean and then back to English again:
The some confrontation unit analyst thinks a process Sandra.day.o’connor, in President Bush the woman who if transfers or ethnic minority pebble l White House also history will make after a stock the thing which begs different type is,: It will change the direction and a future of the court of justice theyn the place strong conservatism it will cut and it nominated.
Ah, much better.

