Comments on: charley vs god

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:55:44 +0000

What about Round 8.. “Damning scientists to hell for all eternity”? I guess that would be more relevent if it were you Vs. the Pope. What about Hulk Hogan Vs. God, or Hulk Hogan Vs. The Pope? What about deaf children?

Have you considered these things at all?

By: Sammie

Sammie — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:41:17 +0000

Good thing God also has a sense of humor!!

By: God

God — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:54:07 +0000

First things first.. Please don’t speak for me. I did not even chortle a thunderbolt from reading this article.

In fact, I am rather humorless. One time as a joke, about 2000 years ago, I put made these things called “dinosaur bones” and buried them, just to mess with humans. It was a joke, people! But look what happened! People thought they were real. If there were really dinosaurs, don’t you think the bible would have mentioned something?

Anyway.. the article wasn’t funny. Sorry. I am excited for the advance screening of Little Man I was “invited” to. Omnipotence has its perks.

By: Weblog Sin Pies » charley vs t-rex

Weblog Sin Pies » charley vs t-rex — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:20:37 +0000

[…] By Charley Daniels Some scientists say that the ultimate predator of all time is the tyrannosaur. That’s because they haven’t seen me at an all-you-can-eat buffet. Other scientists (and people at the buffet) have a different theory entirely. They believe that T-Rex was a scavenger — like a giant, scaly vulture — and not a predator at all. The scavenger theorists point to evidence of weak jaw muscles, a sign, they say, that the mouth of an adult tyrannosaur was meant for picking up scraps rather than crushing necks. But what does anyone really know about T-Rex, anyway? He is dead, and all we have are bones. I, on the other hand, am alive and can bite through a soda can. That is a well-documented fact. You should see my military-grade nightguard. My dentist says it stops me from biting my own mouth off while I sleep — and he’s kind of like a scientist. So this match may not be as skewed as it appears on the surface. In my last match I took on God. I lost, of course. But T-Rex’s existence is a scientific certainty, while divine beings and dinosaur jaw strength aren’t, so I have a good feeling about this one. Let’s get ready to rumble. […]

By: Weblog Sin Pies » best of 2006 keyword referrals, vol. 2

Weblog Sin Pies » best of 2006 keyword referrals, vol. 2 — Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:28:33 +0000

[…] Neither have I. I don’t think you want any of this. […]

By: Ray

Ray — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:34:02 +0000

Actually, the immaculate conception refers to mary being conceived without original sin. The virgin birth is the term for jesus’ birth. didn’t you pay attention in sunday school?

By: Charley Daniels

Charley Daniels — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:22:13 +0000

Actually, the immaculate conception refers to mary being conceived without original sin.

I plead ignorance. Plus, this is the only way I could make the “immaculate protection” joke, which is obviously more important than, you know, accuracy.