Weblog Sin Pies » keywords

keyword roundup: questions

By Charley Daniels

Keywords do it all nightThought I’d start the long, long month off right with a good old-fashioned keyword roundup. It’s sort of like the stretching you do before the sprint. Or the marathon. Or the bail hearing. Or whatever.

I looked at keyword referrals from Jan. 1, 2007, to right this very second, and I sort of just randomly scanned and stopped when something funny jumped out at me. These are real referrals, though. This installment: questions. Seems a lot of people get on the Internet and instead of approaching their information-finding in a cold, robotic manner, they try to have a conversation with Google. How sweet. Maybe I should start an advice column where I just answer search-engine-referral queries.

> are squat thrusts good?

No! Well, maybe. They certainly don’t look good.

> are ninjas disciplined?

The answer is yes, very. Or else everyone would be a ninja, especially me.

> how does susan lucci’s arms look so good?

For almost a decade she’s been carrying around that Emmy she finally won.

> how many calories in a wedgie

That’s a stumper, but if I had to estimate, I’d say negative forty?

> is it a sin to go poo?

Depends on where. In general? Probably not, but it wouldn’t surprise me.

> whom did mehmet ali agca try to kill in 1981?

Oooh! I know! I know!

> is it possible for someone to have two penises?

Anything is possible if you put your mind to it. Overachiever.

> what good or bad have charley daniels done?

Mom?

photo: Grim Reaper With A Lawnmower

referral of the week

By Charley Daniels

A random Google user found Weblog Sin Pies by searching for the following:

>is looking at boobs a sin?

Hmmm. I guess it depends on why you’re looking, man.

best of 2006 keyword referrals, the finale

By Charley Daniels

December has been a record month for the site’s traffic, mostly due to Project Wonderful, but also because of the response to my post about Stephanie Haranczyk, who went missing Dec. 5 and is still nowhere to be found. There have been requests for updates on the status of that search, but we’ve been reluctant to reveal too much publicly because it’s hard enough to find people who don’t want to be found without their knowing exactly what our tactics are. We will definitely sound a general alert when anything major happens. Thanks for the interest, and continue to spread the word for people to be on the lookout! Stephanie’s sister Isabelle has a MySpace blog with slightly more current information.

On to the keywords. I have really taken something away from searching through the thousands of referrals that Weblog Sin Pies received this year. What I took away was a glimpse into the searching habits of a diverse group, who loves porn and naked fat people. I also took away a great idea, which I will share with you sometime next month, after you’ve forgotten that I said it was “great.” Because maybe it’s, you know, not great at all. I’m not yet confident enough to stand by that statement. And maybe the idea isn’t new, which I should probably figure out before declaring what a genius idea I’ve had.

My only regret about the keyword lists is that I really wish I had compiled them first and then ranked them in order from best to worst, so that these lists got better with each volume. Unfortunately, that requires foresight and effort. No thanks! As it is, you may find that there are better examples in vol.1 and/or vol. 2. Don’t tell me about it, because I probably agree with you. Probably not, actually, but that’s beside the point; just remember that these are in no particular order. Got it?

>i saw you doing pies

E-mail and search engines are not the same thing, my friend. If you want to send someone a message, you’d probably have more luck shouting it out the window than typing it into Google. Unless you were trying to send the message to me, in which case, your methods are unorthodox but effective. Unfortunately, your message is not accurate. One does not “do” pies unless one is inspired by an overrated film about the activity. And in those rare instance, we call that “freakin’ the fillin’” — which I would never do with someone watching.

>poo bandit

The Urban Dictionary has a definition for “poo bandit” that I was unaware of when I wrote this post’s title, which partially comprises the words. Interesting how close I came to the real definition. Pretty close, for a pure coincidence. And here I thought “poo bandit” was just a funny phrase I made up.

>my mercedes
>my dream girl

It’s very unlikely that these referrals are from the same person, but I like to think that they are because of their similarity. I create a fictional man in my head. This guy is always losing things. Dude, search engines help you search, true, but you usually find information about things, not actual things. If you can’t find your car or your woman, call the police. If you never had a car or a woman and you’re hoping Google will provide them, maybe I should imagine you as slightly less pathetic.

>paleontologist pay scale?

You get paid for each syllable in the names of organisms you discover. So if you discover an ancient frog, you’re not going to do so well that week (the word “ancient” doesn’t count toward your paycheck). On the other hand, you’ll be set for a year if you discover a reticulated, bull-nosed, eight-toed, ridge-backed, turkey-necked, duck-billed, fighting super alligator man.

>boozemas

A new holiday that we can celebrate year-round! And boy do we. There’ll be a champagne fountain (empty by the time the party starts); a rousing session of boozemas carols, including hits such as “Bottle of Wine” and “All for Me Grog”; and on boozemas morning we’ll all exchange punches when our “playful wrestling” turns real. Of course, we can’t forget the reason and spirit of the season: to prove how awesome we are.

>”i didn’t register my car”

I guess some people are placated by typing their indiscretions into a search engine. It’s a confession with no consequences. Maybe it helps them prepare for an actual confession; seeing the search results reminds them that they aren’t alone in their chosen crimes. Some, on the other hand, use the search engine to avoid confessions altogether:

>do fingernails contain dna

Yes they do, partner. So if I were you I would start searching for “immediate flights to countries not included in the extradition treaty.” Don’t leave out the “immediate” part.

>big lumps of poo

It’s a good search string to end the year on because it always comes back to the old No. 2. Every year — in life, politics, relationships, jobs — it’s all just crap. In web searches too, apparently. Try as I might to steer the site’s content away from the topic, the word “poo” consistently brings people to Weblog Sin Pies. And why not? We all do it, except for hot girls. I’m not afraid to receive the shit-seeking masses. All are welcome! Just don’t, you know, talk to me or anything.

best of 2006 keyword referrals, vol. 2

By Charley Daniels

I am on the road, people. The holidays and helping try to find a missing person! AIEEEEEE! Fun. You know what I mean?

So December updates have been (and will continue to be) light and tidy in size, though their entertainment value will be no less robust than usual. I swear it.

That said, check out some of the search strings that people used to stumble upon Weblog Sin Pies this year. Click here for vol. 1.

Some cynics have suggested that I am merely reposting active keywords to draw more search engine traffic. First of all, eff all y’all cynics. Yeah. Second, none of these is a high-traffic referral. In fact, I don’t think more than one person was referred for any given search string that I’m posting. Many are likely from the same sick individual, in fact. So while you enjoy these actual search strings you can do so knowing that it is not some shameless way to draw traffic to the site. If I wanted to do that, I would talk about things that are in top five referrals, such as balderdash words, that Screech sex video, or maybe even feedees. Aren’t keyword referrals interesting? The answer: Yes.

>i have never lost in thumb wrestling

Neither have I. I don’t think you want any of this.

>shaving your privates with fusion

I really don’t recommend this. I don’t even recommend it for your face.

>dentist “ask for a refund”

If you’re in doubt about whether you should, the answer is almost certainly yes.

>psychological insecurity

Some referrals are completely unwarranted, but if you’re curious about this particular topic, you’re probably in the right place.

>funny captions for secret angel

And here’s one where the searcher was directed to the wrong place.

>the mating habits of a yeti

Hey, yeah! Now I’m curious. Thanks, weirdo Google user!

If you think that’s all of the awesome keywords that directed readers to Weblog Sin Pies in 2006, you’re probably one of those people who believes that the “oh face” guy is the funniest thing about the movie Office Space. In other words, you’re so wrong. Stay tuned!

roller coaster of awesome

By Charley Daniels

What the hell did you just search for?What a busy month it’s going to be! I don’t know where I’ll find the time, frankly, what with holiday parties, deciding what the future holds (New Year’s resolution side bets, anyone?), and heading north for the winter. I’ll be in Oregon Dec. 21-26, so don’t come steal my things. Ah hell, I better just bring everything with me.

Hey, I meant to post something about this sooner, but I forgot, I think. Or maybe I just wanted to wait for the right moment. Now I can’t remember why I didn’t post, so chances are good that it’s because I forgot. What the hell am I saying? The folks who brought us Mystery Science Theater 3000 have a website where you can download hilarious audio tracks to play along with movies. It’s the same movie-mocking awesomeness (ostensibly) with a whole new library of films. Did you ever wish that MST3K could rip on newer movies? I know I did. Wish granted! Check out Rifftrax if you’re about to watch Fellowship of the Ring alone on a Friday night for the third weekend in a row. You know, change it up. Oh yeah, it’s not just bad movies that they’re mocking now. Awesome!

You know what’s not awesome? Some genius invented casino-based online poker. Huh? Head down to the casino and play online against a bunch of people sitting across the table from you. Come on! If I go to a casino for poker, I want to feel chips and cards in my hand. And how the hell am I going to tip the cocktail waitress without some chips? Transfer funds to her bank account? I don’t like it.

Returning to things that are awesome: I went and saw Pleaseeasaur again. The last was in September. Does that make me a groupie, or something?

And, to sum up, some things that are maybe awesome, maybe not. Depends. With 2006 drawing to a close, I thought it might be a good time to begin looking back at some of the random keywords that brought people to Weblog Sin Pies this year. It’s Keyword Roundup: The Year in Review, Part 1.

  • mentally+retarded+man+cups+man-boobs
  • I think I posted this one before, but I can’t just suddenly stop appreciating it. Notice the search string — yes, that’s a minus sign at the end. Searcher wanted to exclude the term “boobs,” which makes sense since it would have cleary messed with his results.

  • students+taking+comedy+seriously+university+pie+in+the+face
  • Boy, people really are looking for very specific things on the Internet. Just for fun I put this one into Google to see if anything stood out. You know, maybe to shed some light on whatever this person was trying to find. I got nothing. It’s probably some YouTube thing, right?

  • snakes+at+altitude
  • No doubt someone was directed to WSP during a drunken argument over whether that over-hyped dud of a film Snakes on a Plane could have actually happened. Is it based in reality? Is it not? This is exactly what we’re here for. Maybe not this specifically, because hell if I know, but I’m sure content on this site has solved at least as many drunken arguments as it has started.

  • charley+daniels+republican
  • This could be the search string of a curious country western fan (who doesn’t know how Charlie Daniels spells his name), or my grandfather trying to decide whether to include me in his will.

  • humans humping gorillas
  • Why search? Everyone knows the definitive source is HumansHumpingGorillas.com.

    That’s all for tonight, but I promise there will be more where this came from as Weblog Sin Pies looks at its top keyword referrals for 2006!

    photo: jameschipmunk